Question 2.4.7
Solutions
7 months ago
(a) Notice that the sequence is decreasing since supposing the opposite would lead to a contradiction. For contradiction, suppose that . Then,
and this would then imply that is a smaller upper bound for , directly contradicting the definition of a supremum.
Furthermore, since the sequence is bounded below (from simply being bounded), then also is. Using to denote the lower bound of , that is because
Therefore, by applying MCT, we know that converges.
(b) We define as
The reason why it always exists for bounded sequences is analog to the reason given in (a). That is, is increasing and is bounded above, thereby allowing us to apply MCT.
(c) Consider any bounded sequence . Then, notice that
Additionally, knowing from (a) and (b) that both sequences formed converge (with the inf and sup functions*), we can apply the Order Limit Theorem to obtain
A sequence for which is inequality is strict is the alternating sequence
Clearly, and .
(d) In the forward direction , suppose a bounded sequence for which
Then, we can apply the Squeeze Theorem previously proved since
This then means that converges to the same limit as .
Now, for the converse , assume that converges to . Then, construct the sequences and , defined as
and
Submit a solutionOptional • Markdown
Sign in to share your solution for this question.
Sign in